Service Animals, Emotional Support Animals, and Guide Dogs83309

De GEATI - Grupo de Estudos Avançados em TI
Revisão de 13h52min de 28 de setembro de 2020 por GregfqnkuypdcnMorgan (Discussão | contribs) (Criou página com 'Sadly, many people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system. There have been news stories, articles, opini...')

(dif) ← Edição anterior | Revisão atual (dif) | Versão posterior → (dif)
Ir para: navegação, pesquisa

Sadly, many people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces and other editorials where people rant and complain about people they believe to be abusing the device. You hear some complain that they to sit near your dog at a restaurant they don't believe is really a "real" service dog, varieties complain their neighbors possess a pet inside a "no pet" building simply because they claimed the pet is emotional support animal registration.

A number of the commentary posseses an indignant tone, plus some people are downright angry.

How does this affect those that legitimately own and use a service animal to raised their lives? In several ways.

For one, it can it more challenging to navigate bureaucracy around the globe when your claim of a disability as well as your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. In case a landlord or business owner has heard negative stories claiming that some individuals are abusing the machine, it can cause these to look suspiciously whatsoever claimants.

Some landlord and business owners have begun seeking proof of status, although asking for written or other evidence might not be legal, and although many those who own legitimate service animals and emotional support animals never have taken advantage of registering them, and thus have no such documentation to produce.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and companies that make registrations services such as the Service Animal Registry of California so fundamental to legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can benefit shortcut the housing rental and business access issues when the owner can produce a simple document which will often fulfill the owner or landlord. Also, when utilizing public spaces, it's easier to give over a document having a simple sentence stating, "This is really a service animal" and letting one other party browse the information, as opposed to having a long-winded protracted conversation (or even worse, argument) in public, with onlookers listening in and gathering across the discussion.

So, perform some people scam the machine, or game regulations? Sadly, the answer is "probably yes." In everyday life, there is always room for abuse the ones can attempt to take advantage of many systems that we as a society set up to protect the rights of those who need such protection. For example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. Not to mention the number of people who lie on their own tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse store return policies, or do other bad acts.

But that percentage of abuse, which in the area of service animal laws is hopefully small, could well be a very small price to pay when compared to the higher objective of promoting access and equality for many.

In the end, you can't control any system to make it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the few individuals who scam service animal laws may be the price we gladly pay to make sure that the disabled within the great condition of California have equal access under law.