Service Animals, Emotional Support Animals, and Guide Dogs9350301

De GEATI - Grupo de Estudos Avançados em TI
Revisão de 13h55min de 28 de setembro de 2020 por StephenlyaokyhnitFaden (Discussão | contribs) (Criou página com 'Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are being abused by those who want to scam the system. There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces as w...')

(dif) ← Edição anterior | Revisão atual (dif) | Versão posterior → (dif)
Ir para: navegação, pesquisa

Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are being abused by those who want to scam the system.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces as well as other editorials where people rant and complain about people they think to be abusing the system. You hear some complain that they had to sit near your pet dog at a restaurant that they don't believe is a "real" service dog, forms of languages complain their neighbors possess a pet in a "no pet" building since they claimed your pet is emotional support animal.

A number of the commentary has an indignant tone, and some people are downright angry.

How does this affect people who legitimately own and make use of a service animal to higher their lives? In several ways.

For one, it could it more difficult to navigate bureaucracy around the globe when your claim of the disability and your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. If a landlord or business owner has heard negative stories claiming that many people are abusing the device, it can cause these to look suspiciously at all claimants.

Some landlord and business owners have begun requesting proof of status, even though asking for written or another evidence isn't necessarily legal, and although many those who own legitimate service animals and emotional support animals never have taken advantage of registering them, and therefore have no such documentation to create.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business owners that make registrations services just like the Service Animal Registry of California so fundamental to legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can benefit shortcut the housing rental and business access issues if the owner can produce a simple document that will often match the owner or landlord. Also, when working with public spaces, it is usually easier to give a document having a simple sentence stating, "This can be a service animal" and letting another party see the information, rather than having a long-winded protracted conversation (or worse, argument) in public, with onlookers listening in and gathering round the discussion.

So, perform some people scam the system, or game what the law states? Sadly, the reply is "probably yes." In everyday life, there is always room for abuse the ones can attempt to take advantage of many systems that individuals as a society set up to protect the rights of people who need such protection. For instance, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. Not forgetting the number of people who lie on their tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse store return policies, or do other bad acts.

But that percentage of abuse, which in the area of service animal laws is hopefully small, is arguably a very small price to pay when compared to the higher purpose of promoting access and equality for many.

In the end, you can not control any system to make it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the not enough people who scam service animal laws will be the price we gladly pay to ensure the disabled within the great condition of California have equal access under law.